Wednesday, April 08, 2009

The Marvel of the Good Time

"The veritable position of the I in time consists in interrupting time by punctuating it with beginnings" (Levinas, Totality, p. 143). What does the beginning begin from? Is there a time outside of beginnings that would allow for something coming before and after, or a beginning against which other beginnings could be measured? What would be the qualities of such a time outside of beginnings, a time from which beginnings could begin?

The primordial positivity of enjoyment, perfectly innocent, is opposed to nothing and in this sense suffices to itself from the first. An instant or standstill, it is the success of the carpe diem, the sovereignty of the "after us the deluge." These pretensions would be pure nonsense and not eternal temptation could not enjoyment tear itself absolutely from the disintegration characteristic of duration.

(p. 145)

Would joyless time be recognizable as time itself, or would we have to arrive at a recognition of joyless time by a process of subtraction?

We have sought to elaborate the notion of enjoyment in which the I arises and pulsates: we have not determined the I be freedom. Freedom as the possibility of commencement, referring to happiness, to the marvel of the good time standing out from the continuity of the hours, is the production of the I and not one experience among others that "happens" to the I. Separation and atheism, these negative notions, are produced by positive events. To be I, atheist, at home with oneself, separated, happy, created–these are synonyms.

(p. 148)

How does one freely commence enjoying a time apart from the dreary blur of hours? Does one simply say "Let's enjoy ourselves?" Before we produce our freedom, as the possibility of commencement, mustn't we recognize our unfreedom (I'm not going there just yet), our being in the thrall of miseries or at the whim of passions? In what time does this recognition take place? The break from time, or the interruption of duration, appears then to have occurred prior to the onset of beginnings. This being prior bespeaks a felt time, or a response to temporal passions that may itself be passionately felt–indeed if it does give rise to the production of enjoyment it would be passionately felt, though it may appear as passionately felt only after the fact of an enjoyment, or, rather more precisely, a commencement which signifies enjoyment. Commencement would then be prior in its appearance to the ego, the nexus of feeling, prior even to time, which, if it is constituted by the feeling subject, is constituted only after the fact of its being felt, and perhaps also then after its quality of feeling had being signified, even meontically. Hmm.

Labels: , ,

posted by Fido the Yak at 6:44 AM.


Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hmm, just 'examined' an m.a.thesis on the rajneesh movement (remember the oregon ranch)! It made me revisit a lot of things like Krishnamurti and Gurdjieff - even Chogyam Trungpa Ringpoche (Boulder, Colorado). And Crocco's 'inside the instant'.
'thought , which is matter, cannot seek that which is beyond time, for thought is memory, and the experience in that memory is as dead as the leaf of last autumn.' (Krishnamurti, Meditations, 1969.) 'It was one of those lovely mornings that have never been before. The sun was just coming up and you saw it between the eucalyptus and the pine. ......'
Agenanda Bharati wrote a useful bk called 'Light at the Center, context and pretext in modern mysticism,' right up your alley I surmise....
hugs, p.

April 09, 2009 2:27 AM  
Blogger Fido the Yak said...

Never heard of Agehananda Bharati before. Shame on me. Now I've got Light at the Center and one of his ethnographic works to pick up at the library.

April 09, 2009 3:59 PM  
Blogger Fido the Yak said...

I don't know about thought being memory, rather than memory being a kind of thought. You know the da Vinci quote about argument from authority? When I'm thinking I feel alive and engaged. But this feeling I have about thinking is so ambivalent.

April 09, 2009 4:01 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

For the 'actualism' of Crocco, the past and future are 'in the present' of an empsyched being. So in a sense everything is in the present moment. This is the Jurassic transformed - here, now, in this moment.
Bharati was one of the few german sanskrit knowledgeable folk around ages ago. He went to India and became a sannyasin. Wrote the 'Ochre Robe', and eventually made it to the u.s. of a. Witty, ironic and perceptive. Dated but still quite valuable. He liked Alan Watts and Krishnamurti (and Gurdjieff)....

Be here now (Ram Dass)!

April 09, 2009 7:17 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

btw, you can't be expected to know everything, you're doing a great job out there in the jungle - no shame (smile)

April 10, 2009 2:41 AM  

Post a Comment

Fido the Yak front page