Fido the Yak

See Eric Mohr's post on Intentionality in Early German Phenomenology.

Does Scheler's idea of an ens amans (loving being) upset a received notion of ontology, or was this already going to be upset anyway by the idea of intentionality? In what sense are phenomenology or existential phenomenology not anthropologies? Just rambling.

Labels: anthropology, love, Mohr, phenomenology, Scheler

posted by Fido the Yak at 4:00 PM.